NAA Comms: Our Voice & Our Lane
NAA’sInternal VoiceUse and Lane
Only
Our Voice
The perspective and tone of Never Again Action.
- Direct and honest
- “Hey, I’m just going to level with you, here’s what’s going on”
- Cut through the noise
- Be human, not non-profity
- Heaviness
- Really feel the weight and stakes of what’s happening
- The historical weight
- The emotional weight
- Really let it sink in
- Bold, unafraid to be confrontational
- Sharp moral lines
- There’s us and there’s them. Which side are you on? There’s no gray area when it comes to fascism, to detaining and deporting people.
- Respect everyone and especially people who are harmed by the systems we’re fighting
- We write as though a directly impacted person is sat next to us and let that guide our respect for immigrants of all statuses and people with all experiences of incarceration
- We use language that aligns with disability justice principles
- Mischief at times
- Our boldness and directness give us license sometimes to be mischievous
- Like ‘Flood ICE’, would hate to fuck that up for you, assholes
- Pranking the school bully vibe
- Bringing a sense of urgency
- Telling personal stories with real-time stakes, talking about the ever-increasing number of deportations
- Really value our audience's time and attention
- Let’s make this snappy! Looking for short and interesting over long and technical
- Pride in our chapters, our work, and our organizing
- Boom, we just did this!
- Not accepting the legitimacy of the things around us
- The government is fucked up
- Capitalism is fucked up
- Aware of the context in which we’re operating
- Jewish!
- Driven by our Jewish values
- Driven by our Jewish history
- Avoid:
- Jargon.
- We try to write things in pretty simple language
- We want to be conscious of things that need to be explained, but want to minimize the number of those things. Try to be precise & concise when we do explain things (instead of rushing through / writing something long and boring)
Our Lane
The things we talk about.
- Narrative interventions
- For example; “The US has a deportation system, not an immigration system”, “Never again means never again for anyone”
- Reframe conventional thinking and put forward a new story that drives the change we need
- Pushing forward our campaign
- Individual stories of immigrants that have been/are being mistreated, other stories that are moving and show the horrors of the immigration system
- Amplifying our partners
- Amplifying local chapters
- New angles
- Big report that we thought was really illuminating
- Stuff that we’d actually send to our friends
- You’re only going to share if it felt important to you and you thought it would mean something to you
- News
- Amplifying news that fits our narrative
- Shitty things at the border, internal immigration, etc
- Things that make you FEEL
- Don’t get caught up in other stuff, pay attention to what is moving to you
- Showing the emotional impact that stuff is having on us
- Behind the curtain / we’re real people vibes
- Highlighting cool tactics
- Inspiring brave actions in other movements
- Humility / passing the mic vibes
- Bringing in people to talk about important things we’re not qualified to talk about
- Variety of voices
- Warnings
- Risks of a coup
- Early warning system for things that aren’t getting as much attention as they should be (i.e. convoy stuff is scary)
- Bridge between antifascist analysts and normies
- NOT our lane
- Anything we don’t think is going to happen (like the many things moving through Congress that never had a chance of passing). We don’t create false hope or put faith into systems of power that won’t create the change we need
- Things that are not in our theory of change (unless there’s a really good reason)
How we talk to other people on social media.
- Be discerning:
- Not everything is worth our time, and not everything carries urgency
- Always consider the goals when responding to people – ask yourself, “What would be the purpose of responding?”
- Would it be to clear up misconceptions?
- Would it be to further educate our public?
- Would it be to answer a legitimate question from an audience member?
- Will our responses get our messages across and reinforce them?
- Is there a net benefit to responding versus not responding?
- Will our responses fit “our voice?” (See above)
- Are we accepting the risk of trolls to our pages?
- If we want to respond to an antagonist, ask yourself the following:
- Is this an obvious troll with a newly created profile and/or very few followers?
- You can ignore this person.
- Is this a member of the opposition with a large platform? (A GOP politician, conservative commentator/influencer, etc)
- You can respond to this person/QRT them.
- We don’t engage in negative responses more than once.
- We say our piece in the OP, reinforce it in the response, and we don’t do any more.
- Let the other person give us the attention and boost our content!
- It’s better to not respond at all than to respond poorly–
- Err on the side of caution and if you’re not sure, ask for feedback from someone about your content!
- Tone:
- Unapologetically pro-immigrant
- We boldly and straightforwardly question anti-immigrant responses to our post and challenge the normalization of this rhetoric
- Stay consistent within our (above) “voice”/tone guidelines!
- On snarkiness:
- It can be appropriate, depending on the context!
- Display sharp moral lines representative of our “voice”
- Pranking the school bully vibes
- If you’re considering responding to something with a snarky tone, ask yourself the following:
- Would we be punching up or punching down?
- Are we clearly defending the humanity of immigrants, while being snarky?
- If our wording loses that humanity, choose different wording, or don’t engage.
- On irreverence:
- We stick to mocking fascists, Republicans, and white, anti-immigrant people
- We don’t take the perspective of BIPOC folks unless it’s explicitly stated that a Black or Indigenous person or other POC is taking the mic
- We typically take a Jewish perspective and, while Jewish people come in all races and backgrounds, most of our audience will assume a white person is behind the words.
- As a standard practice, we don’t make jokes from the perspective of the people being marginalized by the policies we’re addressing.
- Our perspective is as allies, except when addressing antisemitism.
- When needed, we will explicitly state how we/the person making the post is directly affected by the harmful policies that are the subject of the content.
- Reinforce our messaging in our space.
- All responses to comments on our posts should reinforce our current campaign, or the message of the original post
- Uplift our partners!!
- Express support for our partners in their own space and boost them in our space!
- Like, comment, and share their content!
- Instagram stories
- Retweet, or quote-retweet them
- With permission, and appropriate context, tag them when relevant
- (if sharing on Instagram stories, or in captions on an Instagram or Twitter post)
- How to handle emotions
- Social media can be an emotional rollercoaster!
- Sometimes, emotions can get the better of us – here’s some guidelines on how to keep things in check when logged into a Never Again Action account:
- We don’t want to respond just because we want to be right
- Be logical – how are we furthering the movement with what we say?
- Reminding yourself: It is about solidarity and not personal victories!
- It’s easy for us to miss when we cause harm, and can lead to accidental harm, as not-directly affected people – please be aware of this!